Friday, October 31, 2014
Thursday, October 30, 2014
Dr. Kevin Folta, the same professor and scientist that called Food Babe out on her recent speech at the University of Florida (you can read his response here), sat down with Global News to discuss biotech crops. Definitely a good video to share with friends on the fence - he's articulate, smart, and a scientist!
Wednesday, October 29, 2014
|Image courtesy of FreeDigitalPhotos.net.|
But even if you aren't in one of those states, it's a good idea to keep in mind who might be supporting these bad ballot proposals and why.
It just so happens that the Wall Street Journal published an editorial yesterday calling out sectors of the organic market that are dead set on these measures passing, and they're ready and willing to pay for it too!
The editorial says:
If you can’t beat them, ask the government to stigmatize them. That’s the adage in Oregon and Colorado, where organic-farming interests posing as champions of consumer transparency are hoping to persuade voters to approve ballot initiatives on Nov. 4 requiring costly and useless food labels.
* * *
Long-term, the organic protectionists want to eliminate this safe, reliable technology that’s revolutionized agriculture and made food more affordable. The Organic Consumers Association, whose lobbying arm pitched in $300,000 for Measure 92, calls for a “global moratorium on genetically engineered foods and crops” on its website. Labeling is merely step one.You can check the full article out here. (I understand that you may need a subscription to view the article, but don't worry because I pulled the best quotes for you!)
Tuesday, October 28, 2014
I think Mr. McGuire and I would get along very well. Conventional farmers that are actively employing modern technologies and innovations in their farm operations are the real sustainable farmers. It's too bad that other methods, which cannot make the same claim, tend to get such credit.
|"To those who like to eat..."|
Monday, October 27, 2014
|Corn kernels which have|
been treated for planting.
To some extent, the success of those tiny seeds just has to be left up to fate. But there are a lot of dangers that the seed and plant have to survive those first few weeks. We have tools to limit the risks to those seeds and help those little plants get a good start. One way is through the use of seed treatments. I first discussed seed treatments briefly during one of my very first Farming Fridays! articles.
Unfortunately, the typical fear-mongers have attempted to twist the practice of seed treatments into something dangerous. Among the worst offenders is the Oregon ballot proposal campaign to require mandatory GMO labels. A commercial produced by the labeling initiative's supporters claims the seed treatment is some type of freaky toxins that are put on GMO crops and hurt consumers.
Reality, as usual, is a completely different -- and a much less scary -- story.
How do seed treatments help?
Seed treatments are applied for a variety of problems that the seed or brand new plant may encounter upon planting. All seeds, whether they contain genetically engineered traits or not, may have treatment options available. Conventional crops, including hybrids that are not considered GMO, can be treated. And yes, even organic farmers use some types of seed treatment.The goal is to protect the seed once it is put into the ground so it can grow into a strong and healthy plant. Imagine all of the potential problems that seed may encounter out in nature - insects, disease, bacteria, and fungus.
I asked my friend and Pioneer seed salesman John to give me the scoop on the different options available for farmers. According to John, the basic seed treatments include fungicides and insecticides applied to prevent early disease and insect feeding. Farmers can also choose to have additional treatment that will help the seed germinate, target certain microscopic insects like nematodes, or protect the seed from fungal pathogens, such as phytopthora root rot and seed corn maggots.
Farmers can also opt for custom seed treatments, depending on the seed company and the farmer's individual needs. Brian, a farmer in Texas, explained to me that he buys custom seed treatments for his grain sorghum (which, by the way, is not available with genetically engineered traits) with the pesticide "Cruiser." This actually stops "sucking insects" from damaging the crop while it is small and vulnerable. On his cotton seeds, he purchases an additional fungicide called "Dynasty."
Giving the plant a good start helps farmers grow better quality crops with higher yields.
In organic farming, the seed treatments are for a slightly different purpose, which also means the result is different. But these include priming, pelletizing, and the use of hot water or NOP-compliant protectants. You can read more about the treatments and differences here.
Are seed treatments safe?
Much like every other aspect of agriculture, there are strict guidelines and regulations imposed by the federal government through the Environmental Protection Agency. In fact, the Federal Seed Act lays out the regulatory framework for seed treatments. Clear labeling is required on seeds that have been treated, including the precise name of the treatment given. Just as with any other pesticide, seed treatments are also regulated under the Federal Insecticide, Rodenticide, and Fungicide Act (FIFRA) by the EPA.
|Soybeans just harvested -|
no seed treatment.
As always, it is important to remember that the dose matters. The amount of the fungicide or insecticide applied to the seeds is very small. The seed isn't very big and doesn't need much of the treatment. The efficacy of the seed treatment is usually gone within 4 to 5 weeks. Once the plant gets a little bigger it develops a natural ability to protect itself from most of these concerns.
Finally, it may be worth noting that when the crop is harvested in the field -- regardless of the purpose -- there is no coating on the seeds. Just because a little seed was put into the ground with some type of treatment does not mean the crop will come out of the field with a seed treatment on it. If you walked into any corn field that started with seed treatment, you would could easily see that the kernels of corn are a golden color, not blue or pink or purple. Treated crops would not be accepted for sale at any grain handling facility.
How does the seed treatment effect the environment?
Of course, as farmers, we're naturally concerned about the environment and the impact that any of our modern practices have on it. We've seen improvements here too! Seed treatments are actually a better way for farmers to get the type of protections needed for their crops when compared to other methods. Consider this:
Modern seed treatments coat the outside of the seed providing very targeted protection. The amount of active ingredient introduced to the environment with seed treatments is only 10% of that contributed by in-furrow treatments; and it’s only 1% of foliar sprays. This technology also facilitates a no-till, precision agricultural operation that protects fragile soils; reducing erosion, compaction and loss of nutrients, and helping to ensure that every seed planted can grow.(Source: Farm.com)
Why the color?
The seed in the photo above is blue-green, but seed treatments can come in an array of colors - blue, green, pink, or purple. Frank, a farmer from northeast Iowa, explained that although the treatment is put on to protect the seed, the colors act like a type of code that clues the farmer into what type of seed is being used. For example, seeds that have the Round-Up Ready genetic traits may be dyed green. Seeds that use the Liberty Link genetic traits may be colored purple.
This way, even if the seeds are no longer in the packaging, a farmer can quickly and easily identify the type of seed being used.
If you would like to learn more about seed treatments, the best people to talk to are those actively engaged in farming. I asked a number of farmers and seed dealers to contribute to this article and they were more than happy to answer any questions! It should go without saying that an anti-agriculture campaign or other fear-mongers are not very reliable sources.
If you're more comfortable reading on your own, I suggest this article posted on Ask the Farmers. Otherwise, for more information on seed treatment, check out the following link for the American Seed Trade Association:
Friday, October 24, 2014
Food Babe and some of her GMO-labeling friends have been spreading this meme around. The GMO-labeling campaigns are also using this idea to scare voters in Colorado and Oregon.
Too bad they didn't think to ask a farmer why the seeds were blue (hint: it isn't because they're GMO seeds).
(A full article on this will follow on Monday!)
Harvest is in full swing over here -- and so is fall! As if we needed a reminder of the colder weather coming, most mornings we've been greeted by frost. Thankfully, it is late enough in the season that this won't affect any of our crops or yields. Of course, earlier frosts can definitely hurt our crops, including soybeans.
But you definitely can't beat the view from the combine!!
We have been switching between picking corn and picking soybeans. It really depends on which fields are ready and which crops needed to be dried in the grain bins. Dad has been getting up and leaving the house by 6:30am -- even before the lawyer! -- and hauling to the granary.
|The view from the combine|
In the field, we've been dumping the full combine into the grain cart (pictured above is one of our smaller trucks, not the grain cart). Then the grain cart unloads into the semi-trailer. The semi either gets dumped in the grain bins for drying or it makes the trip down to the granary.
According to the Harvest map, the average yield for soybeans is 52 bushels per acre. For corn, it is around 155 bushels per acre. We'll just say that not all of ours has been that good... the weather really didn't cooperate this August. We needed more rain and a bit more heat.
So far we've harvested about 250 acres, with about left to go 600.